Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Alcar

Quick Sandbox Questions.......

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone;

I hope this message finds that all of you have been doing well.  I've gotten pretty busy with my business so I apologize in advance if this has been common knowledge for a while.  I briefly looked around and couldn't find anything; so I thought I'd check in with my CSC friends.

I saw a while back that CSC lost their partner that was going to participate in the sandbox with them.  This didn't have anything to do with CSC, but rather the partner had to back out due to thier circumstances that I don't think were revealed.  My questions are:

1. Was this a situation where being that the partner couldn't participate, that completely put CSC out of participating in the sandbox or would/did CSC have an opportunity to secure another partner to participate with them?

2. If this turn of events did prevent CSC from participating in the sandbox, does it matter?  In other words, does the fact that CSC cannot now participate in the sandbox put them "behind" so to speak? Or, is this a "neutral" (not bad or good) kind of situation?

 

Thanks in advance!!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Alcar said:

Hi Everyone;

I hope this message finds that all of you have been doing well.  I've gotten pretty busy with my business so I apologize in advance if this has been common knowledge for a while.  I briefly looked around and couldn't find anything; so I thought I'd check in with my CSC friends.

I saw a while back that CSC lost their partner that was going to participate in the sandbox with them.  This didn't have anything to do with CSC, but rather the partner had to back out due to thier circumstances that I don't think were revealed.  My questions are:

1. Was this a situation where being that the partner couldn't participate, that completely put CSC out of participating in the sandbox or would/did CSC have an opportunity to secure another partner to participate with them?

2. If this turn of events did prevent CSC from participating in the sandbox, does it matter?  In other words, does the fact that CSC cannot now participate in the sandbox put them "behind" so to speak? Or, is this a "neutral" (not bad or good) kind of situation?

 

Thanks in advance!!!

Don't really matter that much. 

 

The deal with Cammegh puts CasinoCoin tech in buildings of Casinos all around the world. 

There is another sandbox in the IOM. 

So the CasinoCoin foundation can still do it at a later date. 

 

They did not lose the partner. It was a change of circumstances for the partner.  

Edited by Mr X
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mr X said:

Don't really matter that much. 

 

The deal with Cammegh puts CasinoCoin tech in buildings of Casinos all around the world. 

There is another sandbox in the IOM. 

So the CasinoCoin foundation can still do it at a later date. 

 

They did not lose the partner. It was a change of circumstances for the partner.  

Thank you my friend!!! Yea, when I said "lost" I meant for the participation in the sandbox; not that they completely "lost" them as a partner.  Glad you clarified for others though.  Also, good point about Cammegh.  The tech implemented in the real world is better than any sandbox.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Foundations members pointed out Q4 2019 will be a flurry of announcements. Certainly the realization of the token ecosystem is itself huge news! However, I am also looking for word on the core biz use case of BRM adoption by one or more operators as EOY 2019 would mark a full year of no “announced” BRM partner. Does it matter in the  short-term: no. It takes patience and execution for the magic to happen.

Edited by ChrisCodec
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, ChrisCodec said:

Foundations members pointed out Q4 2019 will be a flurry of announcements. Certainly the realization of the token ecosystem is itself huge news! However, I am also looking for word on the core biz use case of BRM adoption by one or more operators as EOY 2019 would mark a full year of no “announced” BRM partner. Does it matter in the  short-term: no. It takes patience and execution for the magic to happen.

When did they point that out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Wutang2889 said:

When did they point that out?

Get on the Discord channel and do some reading. It’s all there, both overt and “hinted” statements.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We had the plan to go into the sandbox with our partner but the project got "too big". It went from "hey lets do this and see how it goes" to "we need to allocate proper funds and a dedicated team". Our partner had strategic biz decisions to make in specific markets and had some mayor internal infrastructure upgrades coming. Kind of unforeseen. One of the three projects had to fall short. Non the less, we are still trying to get it done. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×