Jump to content

Alcar

Member
  • Content Count

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Alcar last won the day on November 20

Alcar had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

64 Neutral

About Alcar

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This from my post above: Additionally, this move is unprecedented as far as I know. Yes, I know that projects like VeChain increased their supply by a lot from what it was, but they did it for other legit reasons. And, when they did it they allocated additional tokens to their holders accordingly to offset the change in supply. Here, they're almost doubling the supply, which will tank our holdings to zero for sure (not that's it's not already zero). They clearly didn't give their holders a second thought. I think they're just delaying their demise. I say that because I think if this project still had legs some of the many "heavy hitters" they HAD on their board would have taken more of a vested interest in the project. I'm afraid that even if they somehow rise out of the ashes from all this, it won't be in my lifetime. They may very well find themselves in trouble (at least in the US). It's true that holding a coin is not like holding a stock in that you don't have ownership in the company, you don't get a vote, blah, blah, blah....However, that doesn't mean you can screw people raw and there are no laws to protect people who bought the coin. In my view, we should at least rise up and e-mail the foundation stating our position. If they don't change their position and at least allocate a potion of the additional supply to offset holders losses that will be created by the additional supply, they will find themselves facing lawsuits, which will destroy them. And by "they" I don't just mean the CSC Foundation. I include Caldwell and the others who we're working on their exit while at the same time giving holders false hope. Other coins have found themselves in deep legal shit for a lot less. We as holders may not technically have a say, but if CSC wants community support they need to step up. Let's put the pressure on; we don't have anything more to lose anyway.
  2. They do have a few deals under their belt. The questions we should ask is where are they at with them now (crazy 8, cammegh, trusttracker)???
  3. A lot to read between the lines in this message, but one glaring item to me is that it look's like they are going to try to get into unregulated side of the gambling world. Anyone else get that? If they do, I'm not sure of the implications that has on us in terms of the legality to own it; especially in the US.
  4. I forgot to mention that it would go a long way if Daniel (or someone at least) came back to this forum to clarify or at least ease some of the concern. Kind of like when he and others from the project we're here when this forum first started and everyone was excited.
  5. This is why decentralization is so important; so things like this can't happen. They are changing the CSC Ledger code to create more supply. Also, I understand that perhaps John will continue to have a small role, but if all that's left is going to be the technical staff who is going be working to move this project forward to the mainstream? Additionally, this move is unprecedented as far as I know. Yes, I know that projects like VeChain increased their supply by a lot from what it was, but they did it for other legit reasons. And, when they did it they allocated additional tokens to their holders accordingly to offset the change in supply. Here, they're almost doubling the supply, which will tank our holdings to zero for sure (not that's it's not already zero). They clearly didn't give their holders a second thought. I think they're just delaying their demise. I say that because I think if this project still had legs some of the many "heavy hitters" they HAD on their board would have taken more of a vested interest in the project. I'm afraid that even if they somehow rise out of the ashes from all this, it won't be in my lifetime. This move also doesn't make sense. Simply creating more coins isn't going to necessarily bring money into the foundation. Who's going to buy them? I might be missing something so perhaps someone smarter than me can weigh in here. So that my post doesn't come off the wrong way, I knew that a micro project like CSC was a big gamble so no sour grapes here. I just don't like how they're handling this with regards to the retail token holders holders. They've been "dark for a while and I think that many of us assumed that it was because they have always touted their "no hype" stance and would only give news when there was REAL news to give. While I always appreciated that, the fact remains we trusted they had the things they outlined in their roadmap and talked about in the community "in the works". The reality is that what they've been working on is "jumping ship". Note that John and Duncan are stepping down with "immediate effect". Also note they're keeping the technical staff, but their Technical Director is leaving. As far as what we're to do with our CSC; I guess we can either sell them now for what little they're worth or we can accept the loss and hold them, maybe we'll get lucky. If you choose that later, their bombshell statement says they'll get back to us in to weeks.
  6. Thanks Venom. I'll do just that.
  7. I downloaded the BRM App on my husbands Iphone and then on my andriod. Went thru the KYC process and the bonus CSC were depostied on my android and the app works fine. On my husbands iphone still hasnt received the CSC bonus and the screen is greyed out, cannot do anything in the app. Anyone else having ios issues?? TIA
  8. https://coil.com/p/wietse/XRPL-Labs-will-launch-XUMM-wallet-platform-for-the-CasinoCoin-blockchain-too/HA19unNhj Love it!!!!
  9. I tried to post this over the weekend, but for some reason, when I click the "insert other media" button and copy the url into it; is doesn't do anything when I click "insert into post". I'm sure I'm doing something wrong. Anyway, there is a link within this article that takes you to another article from igamingbusiness. Read that. It explains that the MGA is commencing it's second phase of the sandbox framework, which is designed to "explore the use of cryptocurrency by licensed gaming operators". In this "phase two", the regulator will accept applications for innovative technology arrangements (ITA's). It goes on to explain what is required by the operator in order to participate. It seems that without an operator to work with CSC will not be able to participate. I started a thread a handful of days ago regarding whether or not CSC being out of the sandbox was a problem. The consensus was "it isn't" although the more I read about what's involved in this I'm still not sure. I know CSC didn't lose the operator as a partner and I know that it was issues related to the partner that disallowed CSC to participate in the sandbox, but I was hopeful that they would have been able to obtain another operator to work with and eventually get involved. Daniel did pop in the thread to explain a little bit and also mentioned that they're still trying to get it done. That said, CSC's platform is being used in the real world (i.e. cammegh) so perhaps it doesn't matter. Thanks team and keep up the great work!
  10. Thank you my friend!!! Yea, when I said "lost" I meant for the participation in the sandbox; not that they completely "lost" them as a partner. Glad you clarified for others though. Also, good point about Cammegh. The tech implemented in the real world is better than any sandbox.
  11. Hi Everyone; I hope this message finds that all of you have been doing well. I've gotten pretty busy with my business so I apologize in advance if this has been common knowledge for a while. I briefly looked around and couldn't find anything; so I thought I'd check in with my CSC friends. I saw a while back that CSC lost their partner that was going to participate in the sandbox with them. This didn't have anything to do with CSC, but rather the partner had to back out due to thier circumstances that I don't think were revealed. My questions are: 1. Was this a situation where being that the partner couldn't participate, that completely put CSC out of participating in the sandbox or would/did CSC have an opportunity to secure another partner to participate with them? 2. If this turn of events did prevent CSC from participating in the sandbox, does it matter? In other words, does the fact that CSC cannot now participate in the sandbox put them "behind" so to speak? Or, is this a "neutral" (not bad or good) kind of situation? Thanks in advance!!!
  12. I voted "yes" for the USA, but it needs a bit of an explanation. Up until last year, only in Nevada. Last year the US Supreme Court ruled on line sports betting (sportsbooks) is now legal. Some states have already jumped on board (i.e. New Jersey & PA). I live in PA and we're now starting to see commercials for on-line sportsbooks. I joined one, but I still keep my off-shore books, because I travel a lot and can't use that one when my IP will come up "out of state". Keep in mind I'm almost certain that the supreme court ruling ONLY applies to on-line sportsbooks and no other types of on-line betting. Keep up the great work Daniel!!!!
  13. Thanks guys. Yea my better half is very smart about this stuff. I do the research and make all the investment decisions and she handles all the custody. We own a lot of crypto and she has like five ledgers nano S's and spreads each coin across them (i.e. there is "X" amount of XRP in each of the ledgers incase something happens to one of them).
  14. Thanks LaGonze. No I NEVER hold anything on an exchange. I got it figured out though. I checked with the wife when she came home (she handles all the custody) and she informed me she has our CSC holdings spread across multiple wallets. My apologies for the false alarm. Thanks again.
  15. Hi everyone. It's been a while so I hope all of you are doing well. Is it possible some got missed on this list, because I'm not on it (and yes I own enough)? Thanks in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...